VILLAGE OF EVENDALE
PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
April 5, 2011
EVENDALE MUNICIPAL BUILDING
The Special March meeting of the Evendale Planning Commission (EPC) was called to order by Doug Lohmeier at 5:30 PM on March 1, 2011. Attending were EPC members Doug Lohmeier (Council Representative), Susan van Amerongen, Dan Frank, and Chris Patterson. Supporting the EPC were Jack Cameron, Pam Morin, James Jeffers (Village Engineer) and Don Apking (Mayor). Not present were EPC member Rob Adams, James Dobrozsi (Architectural Review Board Member), Ralph Terbrueggen (Architectural Review Board Member) and Kathy Farro (Planner, Manley Burke).
Old Business:
1. Evendale Commons Business Park - Concept plan proposed revision and PBD document proposed amendment
a. Concept plan proposed revision
Mr. Mike Ricke with Anchor Properties presented a revised concept site plan that showed area D-1 subdivided into areas D-1A and D-1B.
A potential restaurant my want to change where the retention pond is located in area D-1B so that it can take advantage of having outdoor dining facing the west and water.
The plan also showed the existing detention area in area D-2 that could be used as a possible office site. Area D-2 could still potentially have 1 large office building on the site, but it would most likely still be a 1-story building. There is also the possibility of using multiple smaller detention basins instead of one (1) large basin within area D-2.
b. PBD document proposed amendment
Mr. Mike Ricke also presented some additional modifications to the Heavy commercial PBD Overlay District within Evendale Commons Business Park Requirements. These changes included:
Under Part Three Uses I. Permitted Uses: E. Permitted Uses: Changing Area “D-1” to Area “D-1A” and removing (3)Traditional Sit Down Restaurants as defined in Part Seven, Section (E); and. Adding F. Permitted Uses - Area “D-1B”: The uses listed below are permitted as of right within the Evendale Commons Business Park Area “D-1B”: (1) Traditional Sit Down Restaurants as defined in Part Seven, Section (E).
With these changes, the previous version E. becomes G.; F. becomes H; and G. becomes I. and E(4) becomes E(3).
Under Part Three Uses II. Conditional Uses: D. Conditional Uses: Changing Area “D-1” to Area “D-1A” and removing (2) Fast Casual Restaurants, as defined in Part Seven, Section (E); and (3) Outdoor consumption of food and beverage provided the area is accessory to a restaurant that utilizes 40% of its floor area for seating.
Adding E. Conditional Uses - Area “D-1B”: The uses listed below are permitted as of right in Area “D-1B” subject to the following Conditions of Approval: (1) Outdoor consumption of food and beverage provided the area is accessory to a restaurant that utilizes 40% of its floor area for seating; and (2) Fast Casual Restaurants, as defined in Part Seven, Section (E).
With these changes, the previous version D. becomes F.
Under Part Four Area and Height Requirements Section A. Minimum Lot Area and Dimensions: (2) Areas “D-1” changes to “D-1A”, “D-1B”,; (7) Maximum Building Coverage: a. Area “D-1” becomes “D-1A”, D-1B,; Section B. Maximum Height: (4) Area “D-1” becomes “D-1A”, “D-1b”,; Section C. Development Areas: (4) s was added to Area as well as “D-1A” and “D-1B”; Area “D-2” was removed from being grouped with Areas “D-3” and “D-4”. Area “D-2” now states: It is the intent of the developers of Area “D-2” to crate as many office research sites as possible. This may, if feasible, result in the relocation of the existing retention basin in Area “D-2” – Maximum Development Area: Approximately 6.5 Acres. Under areas “D-3” and “D-4” the word ‘Minimum’ was removed and now consists or a Maximum Developed Area: Approximately 10.5 Acres.
Under Part Six Supplemental Use and Design Regulations Section D. (2)d. Area “D-1” was changed to Area “D-1A”, “D-1B”.
It was requested that a traditional site down restaurant be able to serve alcohol and that something should be drafted in the code to mandate this. It was determined that any verbiage of this nature be brought to Tim Burke prior to placing it in the code.
A motion was made by Chris Patterson and seconded by Susan van Amerongen to approve the modifications to the Concept Site Plan and the PBD document as shown. The motion passed by a 4 yes 0 no vote.
Adjournment:
On a motion to adjourn the meeting by Susan van Amerongen and seconded by Chris Patterson, the meeting was adjourned at 5:59 PM by a 4 yes 0 no vote.
The next regular meeting is scheduled for April 19, 2011 at 6:00 PM.
Doug Lohmeier
Chairperson, Evendale Planning Commission
Attest: Dan Frank
Secretary, Evendale Planning Commission
| 
